I have several topics that I want to write about. However, this clown keeps giving me a reason to delay that.
Everyone should note Daniel Haqiqatjou's pattern. He blocks any criticism of his work and ideas on Facebook, his website, and now I just found out, on Twitter too. Also, he complains about being blocked by Amina Wadud:
Clearly he has some kind of obsessive disorder where he only wants his opinions heard, and everyone else silenced.
Daniel Haqiqatjou has spent the entire day in damage control. If you go and see his twitter account, he has been crying why some of his own followers went against his latest article, where he criticized female Muslims who want to be on panels about religion. Here is the facebook post:
https://www.facebook.com/haqiqatjou/posts/2375429666009075?comment_id=2375818322636876
One thing in particular that stands out is that he used a weak hadith in an effort to "prove" why Muslim women should be essentially banned from speaking on a scholarly level. As you can see from the comments on that post (and also on his Twitter), many people had issue with this, because it is becoming increasingly obvious that he is a psychotic degenerate. Do note, his followers will continue to defend and support him. This isn't new, psychotic freaks throughout history have always gained followers, Daniel is no different.
This guy has issues with EVERYTHING women do. He illogically, irrelevantly, and nonsensically brings in feminism in every single one of his posts. He also makes up his own scenarios, for example in the article on the facebook page, he says this
"And then they make weak, illogical attempts to “islamicize” those new rules in order to hide their feminist origins. For example: “All-male panels are haram because Khadija (r) was a businesswoman!” or “We must ban all-male panels because Khawlah bint al-Azwar (r) fought in battle!” or “Male scholarship is gender biased because Aisha (r) transmitted hadith!” Uh… what? What kind of moronic ijtihad is this?"
No one in history has ever said such a thing. Not surprising though, since he FREQUENTLY says this ridiculous crap and assumes other Muslims say it (you'll see another example in a screenshot below).
Now back to the hadith, he realized he was caught when he quoted the weak hadith. He went on Twitter to take out his frustration. These are screenshots of his ramblings (I had to log out of my Twitter account to get these, and if you have a chance, go on his account and see how SOME of his own dedicated followers are against him for being so erroneous and ignorant)
He goes on and on but you get the idea. Now, I want to address a few things. Haqiqatjou says in the last screenshot that the Prophet said in "multiple places" about dangers of female leadership. This is absolutely bullshit. This is not the first time Haqiqatjou has pulled things out of his own ass. Like seriously, is he trying to be a troll on purpose? Secondly, he quotes another hadith about the Prophet saying no civilization can prosper if it's leader is a woman. This hadith actually referred to the Persian people at the time who appointed a woman to lead the state who was clearly unqualified. As a matter of fact, the following links are from conservative Islamic websites that say women can, and historically have been, leaders of a state:
http://eng.dar-alifta.org/foreign/ViewArticle.aspx?ID=142&text=women
http://aboutislam.net/
The above links also have opinions of classical medevil Muslim scholars who held the view women can be judges and leaders of states. Haqiqatjou is always bragging about him being a traditionalist, well, what about those classical scholars who go against you? Oh right, they must also be "modern" and "liberal".
I asked above for people to go look at some of his followers in being against him (even on Facebook). Here are two links as examples:
https://twitter.com/Haqiqatjou/status/1090669716526505984
https://twitter.com/Haqiqatjou/status/1090680115686764545
You have a fight between his followers, LOL. Typical from conservative right wing hard headed alt-right Muslims.
