Here is a new post I just made about him: http://mymuslimthoughts.blogspot.ca/2018/01/refuting-daniel-haqiqatjou-once-again.html
As much as I hate to say it, Trump is correct in banning Muslims from certain countries.
I have posted on here before about online Islamic forums, certain Islamic youtube channels, and certain Islamic websites which are full of stupidity. Right wing Muslims are a plague. They justify every psychotic statement they make in the name of Islam. Furthermore, every psychotic Muslim preacher or organization will always attract followers. I have no idea why this ummah contains so many idiots who blindly worship anything that is abnormal, degenerate, and swine-like.
I was browsing through a Pakistani facebook page (Pakistan Votes) which is probably one of the very few sane minded pages to exist in the Islamic world. On it I found a screenshot (here is the link to the page https://www.facebook.com/pakistanvotes/posts/1915659475115451) from this man (Daniel Haqiqatjou) who said something like having female friends leads to flirting, which leads to zina. Okay, that I kind of agree with. Then came a response from a Muslim woman to him which went something like having male friends creates understanding between the genders which leads to a decrease in sexual harassment. Obviously this is correct, as I have posted before on here links to studies that show men who see women as equals are far less likely to harass or sexually assault.
I googled this guy's name and I found out he runs the website Muslim Skeptic. It is full of articles that take shots at women, non-Muslims, and those who don't adhere to strict Islamic doctrines. Pretty disgusting huh? It also had articles of him supporting child marriages (because it decreases the chances of "zina") and an article where he compared hijabless women to not wearing a seatbelt. He throws in jokes here and there to make himself look funny, but only his low IQ followers would laugh at them. After seeing his site I found his facebook page, which had the same stupidity on his site. It also showed that he lives in America, which is shocking because Muslims of his caliber should only be found in conservative Islamic countries where they can preach their hate and filth to crowds of uneducated fools. But this time we get to see the sick comments supporting his views. And you know what? Many of his supporters live in America and in Europe. These right wing animals are found living in civilized countries. Sick comments and living in places where tolerance and gender equality are highly respected. How does this make sense in any way?
The following are screenshots of the comments on his page. As I said, psychotic Muslim preachers always attract followers. It is mostly men but as I mentioned before there are always self hating women who will join hands these idiotic right wing Muslim males.
To answer the idiots, gheerah and dayooth are salafi concepts that are aimed at making men insecure and controlling. No civilized man with a rational mind can think in such a way. The sickness in the comments prove how they view women, and they're using Islam to support this stupidity.
P.S. notice the amount of likes these morons get.
P.P.S this guy Bulbulia also wrote a comment on the page saying Muslim men shouldn't let their daughters go to western universities otherwise they would comeback with non-Muslim boyfriends. I would show it but I would have to find it and the amount moronic comments just makes me angry. But you see what kind of freaks are gathered? I remember that comment itself got 5 likes. Shocking and stupid.
And see the self hating women who come on and support this freak:
These are just a few screenshots. There's a lot more vomit on his page.
In reality your article is very foolish. May Allah guide you or break your back
ReplyDeleteHaha. Haqiqatjou worshippers are full of low IQ degeneracy. You freaks should find another religion. Trust me, Islam doesn't suit you.
DeleteGheerah and dayooth are words found im ahadith. Its not "salafi" lol. Reality is you get morality from kuffr liberalism not Quran and sunnah.
ReplyDeleteAs usual, those who stand for "true" Islam always do it behind fake accounts.
DeleteThe hadith on gheerah and dayooth was verified as "authentic" by Al Albani, a SALAFI.
Haqiqatjou is the father of your kufr red pill/incel movement. You idiots have no idea how misguided you are.
I am currently procrastinating and trying to avoid work as much as possible and I have a deadline coming up
ReplyDeleteI have noticed that you are replying in 2021
ReplyDeleteSo I thought I might type stuff
ReplyDeleteYou are probably wondering why I am typing this
ReplyDeleteOr why I am even on this page or how I got here
ReplyDeleteI am wondering the same thing, I will probably keep the rest in this comment because it was asking me if I am a robot, I am not a robot, duh, because I think therefore I am, anyway I came here looking for some contoversy cuz my head was aching from reading controvertial stuff since yesterday and I promised myself to stop so I came here again, but I realised I don't agree with most the article, although I did not come here to defend any people, I am just procrastinating, sorry to waste your time bye bye for now, I will not be able to edit or delete my comments because I will not comment with my google account
ReplyDeleteSalam alaikum
ReplyDeleteYou, who are writing this blog, you fulfill all the images that one has about liberals: you have no facts, no logic, no arguments, but only outrage.
You accuse Haqiqatjous followers repeadetly to have a low-IQ
Of course you have no stats nor evidence for that, you just try to be insulting. I would be interested to see you IQ.
Anyway, IQ is subjective, it can be manipulted and it represents only the capacity of a human being, how much a human COULD achieve.
Hence, you have people with a low or average IQ, but who are succesfull, and people with high IQ who failed in life since they did not use this capacity.
From all the Nazi politicans and generals who were sentenced at the Nuremberg Trial in 1946, everybody had a IQ far above the average score (with the exception of Julius Streicher). Do you think that these people are great? They had high IQ-s!
Although logical thinking is not accepted nor common among liberals like you, I hope that even you started to realize how embarrassing and cringey your attacks against other Muslims are.
Haqiqatjou advocates for child-marriage? What is that?
In Sharia, a boy and a girl are allowed to marry if they are sexually capable and mature. At what age this occurs depends on the context. In Arabian societies, girls became sexually mature with 9-years.
The Cambridge World History of Food says:
Albrecht von Haller (1775), for example, claimed that girls in the southerly regions of Asia, where the climate was warm, were marriageable in their eighth year and gave birth in their ninth or tenth year; conversely, women in Arctic regions did not menstruate until age 23 or 24. This view was shared by other eighteenth-century writers, most notably J.F. Freind (1738), Herman Boerhaave (1744), and Montesquieu (1751). (The Cambridge World History of Food, p.1455
When should people be allowed to marry according to you? With 18-years old? But why? Basedon what criteria did you came to this figure? Why not 16 like in Germany? Or 15, or 17, or 14....?
Of course you have no argument beside the subjective and moronic current zeitgeist of liberalism.
Further, you are attacking Daniel because he argues for gender separation.
Well, here is somebody I know you will take as a authority: Nancy Malkiel, professor of history at Princeton, who will explain to you why gender separation was lifted: https://aeon.co/ideas/coeducation-at-university-was-and-is-no-triumph-of-feminism?fbclid=IwAR1p3yluN6bezFVSjGZubOK6dToOgFdGtrwCvHhExuZ3Bl_dIggddFIZgdQ
Muslim reformists, liberals, progressives who oppose gender separation are often very aggressive and their aggressiveness matches the indignation they feel at the notion that genders should be separated. But why is this such a problem? Even the most secular societies impose gender separation to some extent. Bathrooms are gendered. Locker rooms are gendered. Sports are gendered in general. Secular societies recognize male and female and operationalize those gender distinctions in countless ways.
Muslims simply operationalize gender somewhat differently. But since Muslim practices and gender separation differ from the dominant, Western model, that is a problem. Rather than just acknowledge that Muslims do it differently and that, from a truly secular perspective, there is no reason why the Muslim way is worse than the Western way, these reformists and critics of Islam make it seem like Islam is the only religion and worldview that facilitates gender separation and is therefore backwards and barbaric.
This is a common feature of liberals and progressivists like you: You have zero self-reflexion. You only have buzzwords that you are screaming around.
Please, delete this blog. If u don't want to do this for the sake of the Muslim community, at least do it for yourself, so you don't embarrass yourself anymore.
Salam alaikum
Keep seething in rage, you liberal west bootlicking degenerate. Just to make you more angry I think I'll remind you that most muslims agree with everything up there about modesty and hijb and conservativity/orthodoxy in islam. You are the minority.
ReplyDeleteman it must feel bad to get demolished on your own blog nice stuff akhi
ReplyDelete