Please someone call the police on this guy. A screenshot is at the bottom.
This post contains foul language on my part, and I'm not sorry for it.
I also would just like to thank the amount of Muslims who came out in the comments of his article to call him out. Though that being said, there still is an unfortunate number of swines who support every word he says.
This is my third post (second refutation) about this utter nutjob Daniel Haqiqatjou. Literally, how stupid some Muslims can be is just beyond me. No, stupid isn't the correct word here. Psychotic is.
Daniel is now supporting forced marriage and pedophilia because "it is against liberalism and anything against liberalism/feminism/secularism is something I will support".
Haqiqatjou has taken issue about an Al Jazeerah article talking about forced marriages and forced marriages of little girls. When this happens, these girls are forced to end their education. Let's analyze his latest outburst paragraph by paragraph.
"Another common orientalist trope in Western media: The sad Muslim bride forced into marriage. But this is not Western media. It is Aljazeera."
Yeah so what is so wrong with Al Jazeerah writing an article about a girl being forced into marriage?
"Reflect on the hypocrisy on display with Western culture. It is considered healthy and acceptable for children as young as kindergarten (5 year olds) to "explore their sexual identities" or even their gender. It is perfectly acceptable for school children (6-12 year olds) to be involved with sexting and sexual relationships (as long as it is "safe" sex!). It is natural for high school kids (13-18 year olds) to be sexually active and fornicate to their hearts' content. Only the "late bloomers" are still virgins by freshmen year of college."
Who the hell said young children should explore their sexuality or gender? No one.
WHICH CHILD is "sexting" and involved in "sexual relationships"? What the hell is going on in this moron's head? NO CHILD thinks in such a way. NO CHILD is mentally or physically mature to be involved in such activities. As for high schoolers (13 is not high school by the way, so sad Haqiqatjou is born and raised in the west yet is so stupid to realize 13 year olds are still in junior high/middle school), yes they are heavily involved in dating and sex (though there is also a significant population of religious adherents, and those just not ready to engage in such activity) but they do it with their own CONSENT and WITHIN the same age group. Haqiqatjou somehow compares this to FORCED marriages of LITTLE GIRLS. High schoolers can THINK like adults, LITTLE GIRLS cannot.
"But if a 15 year old gets married, suddenly that is a human rights violation and a crime against humanity?"
Yes dumbass, when a 15 year old is FORCED into marriage, that is a violation of human rights. Let's see what the Prophet pbuh said about forcing daughters into marriage:
Imam Al-Bukhaari from al-Khansa' bint Khidam: "My father married me to his nephew, and I did not like this match, so I complained to the Messenger of Allah ﷺ. He ﷺ said to me: `Accept what your father has arranged.' I said, `I do not wish to accept what my father has arranged.' He ﷺ said, `Then this marriage is invalid, go and marry whomever you wish.' I said, `I have accepted what my father has arranged, but I wanted women to know that fathers have no right in their daughter's matters (i.e. they have no right to force a marriage on them).
"Western standards of sex and marriage are projected onto the rest of the world, but to understand these practices, we have to understand the larger social context. Within kinship based societies, marriage has more than just romantic significance. It has economic and social significance as well. Getting married is an important way to connect families and to create larger networks of support and economic opportunity. Marriage is also the primary avenue of socialization and religious development for young adults."
So the option is to sell off our little daughters and sisters for older men to have sex with? Forcing women in to marriage is good because is "connects" families? Because it has "economic" and "social significance"?
"None of this makes sense from a Western paradigm because Western states have systematically destroyed kinship structures and destroyed the family unit, forcing their populations into an atomized existence, where all must be servile to the state and its corporate subsidiaries."
In my previous refutation of this animal, I showed quotes how Daniel was a big time advocate for women being housewives. He is heavily against any freedom for women. If a woman is not staying at home, cooking, cleaning, or raising children, then she is a liberal feminist who follows reformed Islam.
"Westerners can understand these marriages with a simple analogy. Marriage in kinship based societies is an institution analogous to formal education as an institution in Western states. In the West, children are *forced* -- against their will -- to attend primary school education and then college. This schooling is a means of socialization (i.e., tarbiyya) and often is the only path to economic opportunity and social mobility."
Dumbass Daniel compares forced marriage with children being "forced" to go to school. I'm not going to comment further on how stupid this is.
"Of course, "education" is glamorized in modern discourse, but the reality for many people is that their education buys them a spot as a lowly cog in the engine of corporate drudgery, and only if they're lucky. The vast majority have to content themselves as blue collar or service workers slogging long hours to scrape out a modest living. This is what education buys them, yet we are keen to export this panacea to the rest of the world, i.e., to make sure the poor girls of Niger leave their "forced" marriages to "willingly" go work in the sweatshop. I mean, what other amazing career paths exist in the villages of Niger? Or Afghanistan? Or Iraq? Last time I checked, there weren't many Fortune 500 companies opening offices in this locales. Only us lucky ones in the West get to enjoy deep, fulfilling, meaningful careers as corporate peons, toiling our lives away in order to ensure that investors see sufficient growth from one fiscal quarter to the next."
So what do we do then? Stay at home and not get educated? Education teaches you life skills, ways of communication, and in general fosters your behavior as you grow up. It allows you to be in control of your own life, to make good decisions, and to not submit to anything stupid.
Dumbass Daniel, these girls in Niger, Iraq, and Afghanistan CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE if they're educated. Dumbass, because there aren't great economic opportunities avialble, these girls should pulled out from school and forced into a marriage?
Psychopath, why don't you come out and say you support the Taliban for banning education for girls?
"Islam is a kinship based deen. The family structure is the cornerstone of any healthy society. The majority of the maladies we see around us is due to the disintegration of this structure. We have to be aware of these larger dynamics and be prepared to defend the rationality, morality, and superiority of Islam if we want to address the attacks against the Sharia when it comes to the fiqh of marriage without resorting to superficial reactionism. Unfortunately, the reality is that the average Muslim would be scandalized by the uncensored, unabridged fiqh of nikah. That is why Aljazeera can publish trash like this without pushback."
Yeah, so this is why we should not allow girls to be educated and married off without their consent, because it creates a "healthy" society. This is not a "structure", you fucking idiot. No good comes from this.
Yes, the average sane minded Muslim would be shocked to see a fool like you writing this shit. This proves my whole point about my blog- psychotic preachers of Islam causes apostasy among young Muslims.
"NB: if you go through the details of this report, you can plainly see how insidious it really is. The father explains that his daughter was secretly hanging out with a specific boy, so, given the circumstances and his consideration of the situatoon, he said they need to get married. Seems like a good decision by all accounts. Preventing zina is so important and if there is no reason to delay, why do so? We need to be applauding this father and mother and learn from their example."
A couple of things. Firstly, a girl "hanging out" with a guy doesn't mean they are in love, at all. Secondly, the post by Al Jazeerah features a few women, something Daniel conveniently leaves out. He only mentions one girl, and even then so it is not justifiable to marry her off. The first video shows how young girls are brainwashed into believing they are cursed if they disobey their parents, something Daniel also left out. Nothing is to be "applauded" here.
"And the bride herself admits that her husband is treating her well. I bet she isn't really even that broken up about it but that does not stop aljazeera from making it look like the biggest tragedy of all time. When Muslim women are actually surveyed about their views on being married off early, the vast majority support it and for good reason, but don't expect that to make CNN or BBC. They just dismiss these opinions as internalized patriarchy, false consciousness, and due to a lack of "education," i.e., Western brainwashing."
Look at this bullshit king here. I have never seen any survey about Muslim women supporting the idea of them being married off. This fucked up idiot Haqiqatjou is pulling things from his own ass.
And again, he is conveniently leaving out the stories of other women who are SUFFERING because of forced marriage. Notice how he finds one article, and only picks out certain things from it to fool his audience. There are numerous articles and human rights reports that show little girls suffer when forced into marriages to much older men. Haqiqatjou is so damn stupid to not even be aware of this.
"Furthermore, look at how much they are pushing these UN aid agencies as the saviors who are "educating" the Muslims to avoid early marriage and to limit the number of children they have. This is the kind of social engineering being used to fundamentally disrupt and corrupt the Muslim world under the guise of aid. In reality, it is a continuation of colonization"
In my previous post, I talked how these aid agencies are in fact improving the lives of women. These aid agencies are giving women a voice. Women in Muslim countries do not have the option of limiting the amount of babies she will push out from her vagina. She has to "obey" her husband and the society. She has to stay at home, sacrifice her wishes and dreams, because idiots with Haqiqatjou disease are in abundance. This isn't "colonization".
"Western standards of sex and marriage are projected onto the rest of the world, but to understand these practices, we have to understand the larger social context. Within kinship based societies, marriage has more than just romantic significance. It has economic and social significance as well. Getting married is an important way to connect families and to create larger networks of support and economic opportunity. Marriage is also the primary avenue of socialization and religious development for young adults."
So the option is to sell off our little daughters and sisters for older men to have sex with? Forcing women in to marriage is good because is "connects" families? Because it has "economic" and "social significance"?
"None of this makes sense from a Western paradigm because Western states have systematically destroyed kinship structures and destroyed the family unit, forcing their populations into an atomized existence, where all must be servile to the state and its corporate subsidiaries."
In my previous refutation of this animal, I showed quotes how Daniel was a big time advocate for women being housewives. He is heavily against any freedom for women. If a woman is not staying at home, cooking, cleaning, or raising children, then she is a liberal feminist who follows reformed Islam.
"Westerners can understand these marriages with a simple analogy. Marriage in kinship based societies is an institution analogous to formal education as an institution in Western states. In the West, children are *forced* -- against their will -- to attend primary school education and then college. This schooling is a means of socialization (i.e., tarbiyya) and often is the only path to economic opportunity and social mobility."
Dumbass Daniel compares forced marriage with children being "forced" to go to school. I'm not going to comment further on how stupid this is.
"Of course, "education" is glamorized in modern discourse, but the reality for many people is that their education buys them a spot as a lowly cog in the engine of corporate drudgery, and only if they're lucky. The vast majority have to content themselves as blue collar or service workers slogging long hours to scrape out a modest living. This is what education buys them, yet we are keen to export this panacea to the rest of the world, i.e., to make sure the poor girls of Niger leave their "forced" marriages to "willingly" go work in the sweatshop. I mean, what other amazing career paths exist in the villages of Niger? Or Afghanistan? Or Iraq? Last time I checked, there weren't many Fortune 500 companies opening offices in this locales. Only us lucky ones in the West get to enjoy deep, fulfilling, meaningful careers as corporate peons, toiling our lives away in order to ensure that investors see sufficient growth from one fiscal quarter to the next."
So what do we do then? Stay at home and not get educated? Education teaches you life skills, ways of communication, and in general fosters your behavior as you grow up. It allows you to be in control of your own life, to make good decisions, and to not submit to anything stupid.
Dumbass Daniel, these girls in Niger, Iraq, and Afghanistan CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE if they're educated. Dumbass, because there aren't great economic opportunities avialble, these girls should pulled out from school and forced into a marriage?
Psychopath, why don't you come out and say you support the Taliban for banning education for girls?
"Islam is a kinship based deen. The family structure is the cornerstone of any healthy society. The majority of the maladies we see around us is due to the disintegration of this structure. We have to be aware of these larger dynamics and be prepared to defend the rationality, morality, and superiority of Islam if we want to address the attacks against the Sharia when it comes to the fiqh of marriage without resorting to superficial reactionism. Unfortunately, the reality is that the average Muslim would be scandalized by the uncensored, unabridged fiqh of nikah. That is why Aljazeera can publish trash like this without pushback."
Yeah, so this is why we should not allow girls to be educated and married off without their consent, because it creates a "healthy" society. This is not a "structure", you fucking idiot. No good comes from this.
Yes, the average sane minded Muslim would be shocked to see a fool like you writing this shit. This proves my whole point about my blog- psychotic preachers of Islam causes apostasy among young Muslims.
"NB: if you go through the details of this report, you can plainly see how insidious it really is. The father explains that his daughter was secretly hanging out with a specific boy, so, given the circumstances and his consideration of the situatoon, he said they need to get married. Seems like a good decision by all accounts. Preventing zina is so important and if there is no reason to delay, why do so? We need to be applauding this father and mother and learn from their example."
A couple of things. Firstly, a girl "hanging out" with a guy doesn't mean they are in love, at all. Secondly, the post by Al Jazeerah features a few women, something Daniel conveniently leaves out. He only mentions one girl, and even then so it is not justifiable to marry her off. The first video shows how young girls are brainwashed into believing they are cursed if they disobey their parents, something Daniel also left out. Nothing is to be "applauded" here.
"And the bride herself admits that her husband is treating her well. I bet she isn't really even that broken up about it but that does not stop aljazeera from making it look like the biggest tragedy of all time. When Muslim women are actually surveyed about their views on being married off early, the vast majority support it and for good reason, but don't expect that to make CNN or BBC. They just dismiss these opinions as internalized patriarchy, false consciousness, and due to a lack of "education," i.e., Western brainwashing."
Look at this bullshit king here. I have never seen any survey about Muslim women supporting the idea of them being married off. This fucked up idiot Haqiqatjou is pulling things from his own ass.
And again, he is conveniently leaving out the stories of other women who are SUFFERING because of forced marriage. Notice how he finds one article, and only picks out certain things from it to fool his audience. There are numerous articles and human rights reports that show little girls suffer when forced into marriages to much older men. Haqiqatjou is so damn stupid to not even be aware of this.
"Furthermore, look at how much they are pushing these UN aid agencies as the saviors who are "educating" the Muslims to avoid early marriage and to limit the number of children they have. This is the kind of social engineering being used to fundamentally disrupt and corrupt the Muslim world under the guise of aid. In reality, it is a continuation of colonization"
In my previous post, I talked how these aid agencies are in fact improving the lives of women. These aid agencies are giving women a voice. Women in Muslim countries do not have the option of limiting the amount of babies she will push out from her vagina. She has to "obey" her husband and the society. She has to stay at home, sacrifice her wishes and dreams, because idiots with Haqiqatjou disease are in abundance. This isn't "colonization".
Fools, this is the opinion of almost all muslim classical scholars, but not as you said, bcuz the father can NOT give his daughter to her husband until she is sexualy mature. U must separate between marriage contract on the paper and giving the girl to her husband. IF she is small girl she stays at her fathers home until she is ready for practicing the marriage, in about 15 years or older, it depends from girl to girl. Your nonmuslim girls are having sex without any limits in elementary school, and many of them abort in about 12-13 years...
ReplyDeleteMy non Muslim girls? Your head is full of crap. You dont know anything about girls in the west. Girls in elemtary are CHILDREN, you sick animal. How stupid are you? Judging by your english, you are definately a desi retard. How you low IQ idiots manage to find me and spam up my blog is beyond me. Get out of here and screw off to whatever hellhole cave your emerged from.
DeleteI chose my own marriage. I did extensive research and married a man I love and he is Muslim. I am allowed this choice. Women who haven't started their periods cannot be married. Also I've been hearing that the youngest wife was 9 and even 12, but I've never heard of her being 6. This fat sitting at home "scholar" is getting his information from the wrong source. Women are allowed education. Women can even own their own company. Women can also choose their husbands. Women can have a job. This daniel hapikachu never brings up any valid rights women have.
ReplyDeleteThis is why increasing amounts of young people are starting to doubt Islam and even leaving. If these type of people, have their way Islam, will eventually lose many believers.
ReplyDelete