https://youtube.com/channel/UCQH8JNNtY6xC7DZqwpmeuHQ
Friday, May 27, 2022
See my videos on my Youtube channel!
I've recently uploaded a few videos on my channel, with more planned for the near future InshAllah!
Tuesday, April 20, 2021
False hadith about women being peddled around by Salafi's and Red pill mushriks
Abu Udhaynah reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “The best of your women are loving, fertile, suitable, and comforting, if they fear Allah. The worst of your women unveil their beauty, take pride in their appearance, and they are hypocrites. None of them will enter Paradise except as rarely as you see a red-beaked crow.”
Source: al-Sunan al-Kubrá 12480
This hadith here is false. It us used by Salafi's and Red Pill "Muslims". This hadith is NOT reliable. Remeber this when devient "Muslims" bring this hadith up.
This hadith here is false. It us used by Salafi's and Red Pill "Muslims". This hadith is NOT reliable. Remeber this when devient "Muslims" bring this hadith up.
Thursday, January 14, 2021
Sheikh Assim Al Hakeem is a Salafi/Wahabbi. Do not listen to him
I should be a little mor clear, do not listen to him unless he talks about spirituality, fasting, or prayer. When it comes to other matters, feel free to ignore him, just like all Salafi/Wahhabi sheikhs. This is a DEVIENT group. They do not understand Islam through the lenses of logic, reason, and non-arab norms.
There is a reason this guy disables comments on his Youtube channel. He knows he's controversial. He knows Salafi/Wahabbi aqeedah is disgusting.
There is a reason this guy disables comments on his Youtube channel. He knows he's controversial. He knows Salafi/Wahabbi aqeedah is disgusting.
Tuesday, January 12, 2021
Monday, June 22, 2020
Don't be fooled by Daniel Haqiqatjou's debate with the Apostate Prophet
Islamophobes and rabid troll Muslims are the opposite sides of the same coin. They both like to trigger Muslims, they both like to take Quran verses and hadiths out of context for a "shock" effect, and in general they like seeing other Muslims lose faith.
I have spoken several times about the psychotic fitnah of Daniel Haqiqatjou on here. He's an idiot. He has no training in Islam. He has no degree, no diploma, no certificate, nor any kind of ijaza in Islamic studies. He has a degree in western philosophy, from an American university!
Recently, he debated a noted Islamophobe "Apostate Prophet". Apostate Prophet is very well know in the Muslim and non-Muslim community, because he insults and degrades Islam. Now, why would Daniel debate such a person?
Daniel's main focus has always been criticizing "feminism" (i.e. Muslim women who choose not to be burka covered housewives). If you look on Daniel's twitter or Facebook, 90% of his content is dedicated to "defending" orthodox Islam by attacking and insulting Muslim women, in the name of Islam. Most of the other 10% is dedicated to attacking noted orthodox Islamic scholars like Yasir Qadhi, Omar Sulaimaan, Sheikh Hamza Yusuf, Abu Amina Ilyas, Jonathan Brown, Mufti Menk (!), and so forth. According to Daniel, these scholars have become "feminized" or "cucked" because they don't talk about masculinity. If these scholars don't join the movements he gave birth to (Muslim Red Pill, Incel Muslims, and Muslim MGTOW), then they are are "modernized", and have a "colonized" mentality. Yes, this guy who has given birth to munafiq men's rights movements, this guy who has absolutely nothing in Islamic studies, wants to lecture actual scholars of Islam!
You see what Daniel is trying to do? This debate was a PUBLICITY stunt. He doesn't give a damn about defending Islam from Islamophobes. If he did give a damn, then he wouldn't be finding random articles and random comments about "feminism" on a regular basis. He would instead take on Islamophobes.
Daniel did the same when he debated Imam Tawhidi. He knows Tawhidi is a well known controversial speaker. Now how many times has Daniel actually speak about Tawhidi on his twitter of Facebook? Hardly. As I said above, 90% of his content is dedicated to attacking and insulting women in the name of Islam. He has a very strange obsession in constantly picking on women. Case an point, one example was he linked to an article about Johnny Depp's ex-wife lying about being abused. What was the purpose of this? Even his most dedicated followers (you can see from the comments once in a while) get a little uneasy.
Daniel posts all of his content on Facebook, Twitter, Telegram, YouTube, his website (Muslim Skeptic) and his organization (Al Asna). It is literally all the same bullshit he just recycles over and over. If you pay attention to Daniel, you will see he gets triggered very easily when his followers don't agree with him. He will attack and block anyone who criticizes him. His SIX social media outlets all have the exact same content. Why does he do this on so many social media accounts? He wants to be popular, he wants fame. He knows he can get a quick boost when he goes after Tawhidi or Apostate Prophet.
Here's another example. Haqiqatjou has made a Pakistani scientist/political analyst (Pervez Hoodbhoy) his new target. No one outside of Pakistan knows who Hoodbhoy is. And within Pakistan, Hoodbhoy gets a lot of hate from extremists and radical islamists. Haqiqatjou realized he can get some popularity from Pakistani's. If he goes after Hoodbhoy, Pakistani's will flock to Daniel's social media accounts. This is what Haqiqatjou wants. He see's an opportunity here. He knows Pakistan is a hellhole for women. He see's a market for his popularity here. So it's not surprising so many hyper masculine Pakistani men have now flooded his page and share all of his anti-feminist rhetoric. Haqiqatjou doesn't give a damn about Hoodbhoy. He knows this is a way to get people on to his "Muslim women are westernized!" band wagon. I have mentioned before in my video that I did how so many of these toxic masculine Pakistani men have been banned from popular Pakistani social media pages. It was not a surprise to see so many of them in love with Haqiqatjou's degenerate mentality. It was not surprising to see them share his content about women.
Mark my words, go on his social media accounts and see how he will resort to attacking Muslim women, and "cuckold" Muslim men in a few days. That is all he does. He shitposts, he trolls. He realizes his numbers can grow if he can pull off a few strings. *EDIT* Guess what happened? Go look on Haqiqatjou's Facebook and Twitter since his debate. Out of the dozens of posts he has done since his debate with the Apostate Prophet, the OVERWHELMING MAJORITY of them are attacking feminism, and the rest of his posts have been dedicated to attacking "misguided" scholars. See that? Who called it? Yes, it was me.
P.S to be fair, about a dozen posts from April to June, Haqiqatjou went on long rants against lockdowns. He was quoting articles by conspiracy theorists and "academics" who appear on Fox News. He was losing his head about this! He was having a fit about lockdowns! And guess what? Ever since US states opened, there was a SURGE in coronavirus cases. So far, he has been silent about this topic. He was proven wrong and he won't even correct himself.
I have spoken several times about the psychotic fitnah of Daniel Haqiqatjou on here. He's an idiot. He has no training in Islam. He has no degree, no diploma, no certificate, nor any kind of ijaza in Islamic studies. He has a degree in western philosophy, from an American university!
Recently, he debated a noted Islamophobe "Apostate Prophet". Apostate Prophet is very well know in the Muslim and non-Muslim community, because he insults and degrades Islam. Now, why would Daniel debate such a person?
Daniel's main focus has always been criticizing "feminism" (i.e. Muslim women who choose not to be burka covered housewives). If you look on Daniel's twitter or Facebook, 90% of his content is dedicated to "defending" orthodox Islam by attacking and insulting Muslim women, in the name of Islam. Most of the other 10% is dedicated to attacking noted orthodox Islamic scholars like Yasir Qadhi, Omar Sulaimaan, Sheikh Hamza Yusuf, Abu Amina Ilyas, Jonathan Brown, Mufti Menk (!), and so forth. According to Daniel, these scholars have become "feminized" or "cucked" because they don't talk about masculinity. If these scholars don't join the movements he gave birth to (Muslim Red Pill, Incel Muslims, and Muslim MGTOW), then they are are "modernized", and have a "colonized" mentality. Yes, this guy who has given birth to munafiq men's rights movements, this guy who has absolutely nothing in Islamic studies, wants to lecture actual scholars of Islam!
You see what Daniel is trying to do? This debate was a PUBLICITY stunt. He doesn't give a damn about defending Islam from Islamophobes. If he did give a damn, then he wouldn't be finding random articles and random comments about "feminism" on a regular basis. He would instead take on Islamophobes.
Daniel did the same when he debated Imam Tawhidi. He knows Tawhidi is a well known controversial speaker. Now how many times has Daniel actually speak about Tawhidi on his twitter of Facebook? Hardly. As I said above, 90% of his content is dedicated to attacking and insulting women in the name of Islam. He has a very strange obsession in constantly picking on women. Case an point, one example was he linked to an article about Johnny Depp's ex-wife lying about being abused. What was the purpose of this? Even his most dedicated followers (you can see from the comments once in a while) get a little uneasy.
Daniel posts all of his content on Facebook, Twitter, Telegram, YouTube, his website (Muslim Skeptic) and his organization (Al Asna). It is literally all the same bullshit he just recycles over and over. If you pay attention to Daniel, you will see he gets triggered very easily when his followers don't agree with him. He will attack and block anyone who criticizes him. His SIX social media outlets all have the exact same content. Why does he do this on so many social media accounts? He wants to be popular, he wants fame. He knows he can get a quick boost when he goes after Tawhidi or Apostate Prophet.
Here's another example. Haqiqatjou has made a Pakistani scientist/political analyst (Pervez Hoodbhoy) his new target. No one outside of Pakistan knows who Hoodbhoy is. And within Pakistan, Hoodbhoy gets a lot of hate from extremists and radical islamists. Haqiqatjou realized he can get some popularity from Pakistani's. If he goes after Hoodbhoy, Pakistani's will flock to Daniel's social media accounts. This is what Haqiqatjou wants. He see's an opportunity here. He knows Pakistan is a hellhole for women. He see's a market for his popularity here. So it's not surprising so many hyper masculine Pakistani men have now flooded his page and share all of his anti-feminist rhetoric. Haqiqatjou doesn't give a damn about Hoodbhoy. He knows this is a way to get people on to his "Muslim women are westernized!" band wagon. I have mentioned before in my video that I did how so many of these toxic masculine Pakistani men have been banned from popular Pakistani social media pages. It was not a surprise to see so many of them in love with Haqiqatjou's degenerate mentality. It was not surprising to see them share his content about women.
Mark my words, go on his social media accounts and see how he will resort to attacking Muslim women, and "cuckold" Muslim men in a few days. That is all he does. He shitposts, he trolls. He realizes his numbers can grow if he can pull off a few strings. *EDIT* Guess what happened? Go look on Haqiqatjou's Facebook and Twitter since his debate. Out of the dozens of posts he has done since his debate with the Apostate Prophet, the OVERWHELMING MAJORITY of them are attacking feminism, and the rest of his posts have been dedicated to attacking "misguided" scholars. See that? Who called it? Yes, it was me.
P.S to be fair, about a dozen posts from April to June, Haqiqatjou went on long rants against lockdowns. He was quoting articles by conspiracy theorists and "academics" who appear on Fox News. He was losing his head about this! He was having a fit about lockdowns! And guess what? Ever since US states opened, there was a SURGE in coronavirus cases. So far, he has been silent about this topic. He was proven wrong and he won't even correct himself.
Wednesday, May 6, 2020
Great video by Mufti Abu Layth on hijab not being mandatory for Muslim women
The amount of scholars who say hijab is not mandatory continues to rise. Mufti Abu Layth here, is another one who perfectly explains how hijab is merely Arab culture, because no where in the Quran or in any authentic hadith is there a ruling for women to cover their heads.
The Mufti also goes into detail about insecure men who obsess about hijab. They feel guilty about their own sins, so they try to impose "Islam" on others. He also explains the "burka or bikini" argument used by these insecure men (and the self hating, holier than thou, self righteous females).
Sure, he himself doesn't look like a traditional mufti, but he is one, and his looks shouldn't negate his views.
Anyways, here is the video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRR4o2JZIZc
The Mufti also goes into detail about insecure men who obsess about hijab. They feel guilty about their own sins, so they try to impose "Islam" on others. He also explains the "burka or bikini" argument used by these insecure men (and the self hating, holier than thou, self righteous females).
Sure, he himself doesn't look like a traditional mufti, but he is one, and his looks shouldn't negate his views.
Anyways, here is the video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRR4o2JZIZc
Thursday, January 16, 2020
Why the ijma is unreliable
Ijma is an arabic word in Islamic philosophy which refers to the consensus of scholars. So in other words, when the majority of Islamic scholars agree on a certain matter, according to traditional Islamic jurisprudence, that matter needs to be followed by Muslims. Ijma usually comes into play when a clear answer isn't available from the Quran or Hadith.
Hardline/Salafi/Wahhabi Muslims ALWAYS talk about the ijma to try and prove that there is only one Islam, and that everyone throughout Islamic history has always agreed on every subject (not even close to being true. Islamic scholarship is riddled with differing and contradicting views). I talk about this quite a bit in my article about not having to be a liberal or conservative Muslim:
http://mymuslimthoughts.blogspot.com/2019/02/do-you-have-to-be-liberal-muslim-or.html
Those hardline/Salafi/Wahhabi Muslims throw the "ijma card" when they believe they are right and everyone else is misguided and wrong. I myself personally never questioned the ijma, I mean if the majority of Islamic scholars agreed on something, who am I to go against it?
But then I started to think about silly rulings from scholars, like in Saudi Arabia, where they banned women from driving, or passed rulings that all women need to wear hijab. Like seriously, why? Why is it only in Saudi that these scholars have such absurd rulings? What about orthodox Islamic scholars in Pakistan, why haven't they passed the same rulings? How can orthodox Islamic scholars differ? Keep that train of thought going, why is it conservative scholars in European/Eurasian Muslim countries (Bosnia, Kosovo, Albania, Turkey, Kazakhstan) didn't have the same rulings as other conservative Islamic scholars in different parts of the world?
Here is an article that I did about culture heavily influencing how we view Islam that you might want to take a look at:
http://mymuslimthoughts.blogspot.com/search?q=culture
Anyways, back to the topic of ijma. Here is something interesting that I found. Medieval Muslim scholars had a consensus that the earth was flat:
https://theislamissue.wordpress.com/2019/03/22/scholarly-consensus-of-a-round-earth/
Yes, it is a website critical of Islam. However they prove (with quotes) how early and medieval Muslim scholars literally held the view that the earth is flat. They literally believed that the Quran says the earth is flat! Obviously, we know through modern scholars (and grade 2 science) that the earth is round. Yet there was an ijma on this! The article actually helps Islam because it is a slap in the face to the annoying right wing/Salafi/Wahhabi/hardline Muslims who come at you aggressively.
Similarly, Ibn Taymiyyah, a medieval Muslim scholar, was considered by most scholars at his time to be misguided, a deviant, or even a kaffir. Yet today, conservative Muslims celebrate his work. Right here the ijma ideology is proven wrong again, and conservative muslims did it themselves.
Here is an article by an Islamic scholar that talks about the emotional blackmail right wing/ultraorthodox Muslims use to try and force their beliefs on others:
http://www.khalidzaheer.com/questioning-the-basis-of-ijma/
So, what does this prove? It proves that scholars, even the majority, can be wrong. Scholars are human, they are not divine. The religion of Islam is also not reserved for scholars, Islam is for everyone to understand and practice. Many times, scholars are unable to understand underlying social issues. This doesn't allow them to think critically, but instead just give blind answers.
So next time a right wingWahabi/Salafi Muslim comes at you saying so and so is agreed upon by scholars as being "haraam" or "halaal", tell them about this flat earth example. What is haraam and halaal are clearly mentioned in the Quran and Sunnah, but there is a lot of grey area on a LOT of matters. Unfortunately, hardline right wing Muslims will automatically label them as "haraam" or "halaal" because of what their desires say.
Hardline/Salafi/Wahhabi Muslims ALWAYS talk about the ijma to try and prove that there is only one Islam, and that everyone throughout Islamic history has always agreed on every subject (not even close to being true. Islamic scholarship is riddled with differing and contradicting views). I talk about this quite a bit in my article about not having to be a liberal or conservative Muslim:
http://mymuslimthoughts.blogspot.com/2019/02/do-you-have-to-be-liberal-muslim-or.html
Those hardline/Salafi/Wahhabi Muslims throw the "ijma card" when they believe they are right and everyone else is misguided and wrong. I myself personally never questioned the ijma, I mean if the majority of Islamic scholars agreed on something, who am I to go against it?
But then I started to think about silly rulings from scholars, like in Saudi Arabia, where they banned women from driving, or passed rulings that all women need to wear hijab. Like seriously, why? Why is it only in Saudi that these scholars have such absurd rulings? What about orthodox Islamic scholars in Pakistan, why haven't they passed the same rulings? How can orthodox Islamic scholars differ? Keep that train of thought going, why is it conservative scholars in European/Eurasian Muslim countries (Bosnia, Kosovo, Albania, Turkey, Kazakhstan) didn't have the same rulings as other conservative Islamic scholars in different parts of the world?
Here is an article that I did about culture heavily influencing how we view Islam that you might want to take a look at:
http://mymuslimthoughts.blogspot.com/search?q=culture
Anyways, back to the topic of ijma. Here is something interesting that I found. Medieval Muslim scholars had a consensus that the earth was flat:
https://theislamissue.wordpress.com/2019/03/22/scholarly-consensus-of-a-round-earth/
Yes, it is a website critical of Islam. However they prove (with quotes) how early and medieval Muslim scholars literally held the view that the earth is flat. They literally believed that the Quran says the earth is flat! Obviously, we know through modern scholars (and grade 2 science) that the earth is round. Yet there was an ijma on this! The article actually helps Islam because it is a slap in the face to the annoying right wing/Salafi/Wahhabi/hardline Muslims who come at you aggressively.
Similarly, Ibn Taymiyyah, a medieval Muslim scholar, was considered by most scholars at his time to be misguided, a deviant, or even a kaffir. Yet today, conservative Muslims celebrate his work. Right here the ijma ideology is proven wrong again, and conservative muslims did it themselves.
Here is an article by an Islamic scholar that talks about the emotional blackmail right wing/ultraorthodox Muslims use to try and force their beliefs on others:
http://www.khalidzaheer.com/questioning-the-basis-of-ijma/
So, what does this prove? It proves that scholars, even the majority, can be wrong. Scholars are human, they are not divine. The religion of Islam is also not reserved for scholars, Islam is for everyone to understand and practice. Many times, scholars are unable to understand underlying social issues. This doesn't allow them to think critically, but instead just give blind answers.
So next time a right wingWahabi/Salafi Muslim comes at you saying so and so is agreed upon by scholars as being "haraam" or "halaal", tell them about this flat earth example. What is haraam and halaal are clearly mentioned in the Quran and Sunnah, but there is a lot of grey area on a LOT of matters. Unfortunately, hardline right wing Muslims will automatically label them as "haraam" or "halaal" because of what their desires say.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)