One thing that comes to mind is how popular he wants to be. He has Twitter, Facebook, Youtube, and his own website, all spewing ridiculous hateful comments and articles towards women. I mean obsessive much?
Something else to notice, on his website, he claims to be doing all of this to "fight doubts" about Islam. Yeah, it has the OPPOSITE effect. How stupid can he be to think he is clearing up misconceptions about Islam among Muslims?
In the latest of his pathetic rants towards women, Haqiqatjou recently wrote this article, titled "Want to Be Set for Life? Beat Yourself and Blame Your Husband". Here is the link:
This is the third or fourth time I'm seeing Daniel post a news article about a Muslim woman attacking her husband. On a daily basis, there are DOZENS of news articles from both the West and Muslim world about a Muslim wife or sister or daughter being killed or beaten for honor, or blamed for being raped, or trying to avoid a forced marriage. Also, if you have seen my other blog (pakmentality.blogspot.com), I regularly show comments by Pakistani men towards women that are found on Facebook pages. Also on this blog I have posted videos from YouTube where I draw attention to horrible comments by Muslim men towards women. Yet, ALL of this is conveniently ignored by Haqiqatjou. He NEVER posts anything about this, EVER. Anyone else notice a pattern? He SELECTIVLEY picks out articles showing men being victims! This is something I drew attention to in my video that I did of him.
Anyways, let's get on to his rant and analyze it bit by bit. He starts off by saying "Another great example of why we should always #BelieveAllWomen." Okay, no idea why we should do that. I mean of course Muslim women in most Muslim countries and communities are victims and guilty until proven innocent, but let's see what Haqiqatjou is going on about. This below is from the news article:
"A man has called on the federal government to deport his estranged wife after he claims she attempted to frame him for domestic violence.
Sydney man Faisal met Asmae through the Muslim dating website, Muslima.com.
He was smitten with her, and proposed soon after leaving western Sydney to meet Asmae at her parents’ home in Morocco."
Okay, if this is true, it is indeed a sad story. The woman here is obviously a horrible woman. Now let's see what Haqiqatjou has to say:
"This guy’s first mistake was using a “Muslim dating” website to find a wife. What kind of a wife do you expect to find through such means? You might as well go looking for a good, pious Muslim wife on hook-up apps like Tinder."
Uh huh, and who are you to judge what kind of women are on such websites? How dirty is your mind to think lowly of women in this website? Maybe they signed up because they want to get married, ever thought of that?
"I don’t know about the details of this particular guy, but unfortunately there’s no shortage of Muslim men who want to date around, have zina, act like they don’t care about Islam, but then when it’s time to get married, they suddenly are interested in finding a pious wife online. It’s pathetic and stupid."
For once, I agree with Daniel. This right here is so true. I see Muslim males all around me chasing after white girls (while simultaneously casting fatwas on Muslim women) but wanting a "pure" and "virgin" Muslimah as a wife. It is pathetic and stupid, good on you Haqiqatjou for going after men for once! He continues by quoting the news article:
" However, while Faisal says he was hoping to return to Australia with a life partner, he now believes Asmae did not share that dream.
“She’s a greedy person. She’s materialistic. All she cares about is herself,” Faisal told A Current Affair.
“And dangerous. Very dangerous.”
Faisal worked two jobs after the couple were married, and claimed he spent everything he earned on Asmae."
I feel bad for the guy. This woman is a female version of the many Muslim men that I have talked about on here. Haqiqatjou now continues with his rant:
"Big surprise there. What people don’t understand is that, because of Islamic values, traditional Muslim societies do a great job of helping Muslims and non-Muslims control their desires. If you take someone out of that environment and bring them to the cesspool of the modern West, then those inbuilt safety rails are no longer there to keep a person’s desires in check.
This is exactly why Islam warns of the dangers of the nafs, the dangers of unchecked hawa, the dangers of pursuing the dunya with reckless greed. We are taught qana`a (contentment) and the value of the akhira over the dunya for a reason. Look at what the dunya does to people. Look at what unchecked desires and greed for material does to the individual.
Western culture, consumerism, social structure, hypersexuality all feed into the voracious nafs and turn droves of people into nafsonic monsters, especially those who are new to it coming from traditional Muslim societies. Obviously, there are exceptions, but this is what I have anecdotally seen on dozens of occasions when uncommitted Muslims or marginally religious Muslims move to the West. It’s very sad."
So, he is getting back to his judgmental self again. As many have noticed, Western Muslims tend to be more in line with their religion than those in Muslim countries. As I have mentioned before, Muslim countries fall into two categories: Strictly Orthodox (often mixed with cultural elements, and include the enforcement of strict and literal interpretations of Islam on to everyone, ESPECIALLY on to women. Examples include Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, Somalia, Yemen, and certain parts of pretty much every Muslim country). The second one is right in the middle (basically it is a battlefield between left wing secularists and right wing strict Islamists and Jihadists (in this one, no one gets their way, and the minority middle is trapped between the two). You will notice women in these countries tend to live much better lives when they move to the West. I have mentioned many times before how the West is the best place for Muslim women. These "traditional" Muslim societies are hell for women. And just like how Daniel has lied in the past, he most likely hasn't seen "dozens of occasions" of Muslim immigrants falling into the description he provided. He continues to quote the article:
"But over several months, Faisal grew tired of Asmae’s demands.
He said they were constantly arguing, until one night in April when Faisal walked into an incredible sting when he came home from his night shift at Woolworths.
The unit looked as if had been ransacked, with furniture tipped over, belongings strewn across the floor, walls dented, and broken glass and spilt wine in the bedroom."
Again, this is horrible. Now let's see how Daniel spins it:
"Maybe Asmae had heard a lecture from a white knight imam about how Muslim men are deadbeats and have to provide their wives with maids and cooks and a high standard of living otherwise they are violating your God-given rights. It’s not unlikely."
Okay, so it looks like Daniel can't even make up his own mind when it comes to feminism. Is he advocating for women to be economically independent so they don't have to listen to these "white knight" Imaams? Or is he, as he has repeatedly, insisting on traditional gender roles in which the "white knight" Imaam is correct?
Supporting Muslim women for equal opportunities and rights is the only logical and sane minded thing to do. Supporting their basic human right to be free from harassment (something which is common in the Muslim world) is the only logical and sane minded thing to do. Unfortunately, sick freaks like Haqiqatjou and his followers call this the work of a "white-knight". He continues with the article:
"Inside the lift, she gave herself two uppercuts to her face.
She then went to the police and claimed Faisal had assaulted her.
He was held overnight while officers accompanied Asmae back to the unit to collect her things.
Faisal claimed the police unwittingly helped Asmae steal his belongings, including designer sunglasses, expensive watches and a laptop.
Of greater concern, however, were the four assault charges Faisal faced, which could have seen him jailed for up to seven years.
He spent $20,000 on a lawyer and trolled through hours of apartment CCTV vision until he finally found the footage that proved his innocence.
NSW Police immediately dropped the charges against Faisal, but never moved to charge Asmae with making a false accusation."
The thing is with many domestic violence cases, it is seen as a "personal family matter", which is why at least one party is not charged. Though, if we look throughout the Muslim world, especially in Pakistan and Afghanistan where religious clerics are forbidding domestic violence laws because men have the right to "discipline" wives, THIS is clearly a problem which Daniel doesn't even touch on. This leaves God knows how many women in a state of misery. Go look on my Pak Mentality page, see the sick comments by men towards abused and raped. Why do they do it? Because the laws and society ALLOW them to behave like this. Again, where is Daniel Haqiqatjou?
Anyways, he continues his rant:
"Just imagine if that CCTV footage didn’t exist, this guy could have been serving seven years in jail. His whole life destroyed because of one very simple, easy lie. That’s the injustice of the modern Western legal system. Women just have to make the accusation, cry a little bit in front of the police, and that’s it."
True, but clearly Haqiqatjou is exaggerating.
"It boggles the mind that some feminist Muslims and their white knight allies refuse to understand how insidious this is. Haven’t they read Surat Yusuf? How can they make nonsensical statements like #BelieveAllWomen when the incentive for lying is so high?"
How stupid can Daniel get? WHO is agreeing with the hashtag #BelieveAllWomen in regards to this specific story? NO ONE. Everyone understands this is insidious. And wow, using Islam once again to show women are liars? (For those of you who don't know, there is a story about the Prophet Yusuf (Joseph) who was very handsome and women couldn't keep their hands off of him). How this Surat Yusuf part has anything to do with this specific story is beyond me. Daniel, as proven over and over, just wants to throw religion in, no matter how irrelevant it is, to try and fool his followers. He ends his rant with the following:
"How many other women have lied about being abused but were crafty enough not to punch themselves in front of security cameras? The man loses his house, his belongings, his children, his job, all because his wife got tired of him for whatever reason or wasn’t happy with her standard of living and her shopping allowance.
What kind of a legal system encourages and empowers such women? These witches give all the good Muslim wives and mothers a bad name. Alhamdulillah for Islam where we actually have due process and standards of proof for justifying crimes instead of giving witches a blank check to destroy their families and, by extension, the rest of society in the process."
I don't how how many women have lied about abuse, but again, WHAT about the poor legal system in Muslim countries where women can't even report abuse? And how can you say Islam has a due process system when YOUR OWN WORDS clearly put women at fault?
The whole point of this is again, Daniel is a pathetic illiterate freak.